Referenties boek
ICT en recht

Op deze pagina vind je de referenties van hoofdstuk 8 van het boek ICT & Recht, van auteur Arnoud Engelfriet. 

Meer info en aanschaffen

Referenties hoofdstuk 8
Code as law versus rule of law   

1.    R. Brownsword, ‘Law, authority, and respect: three waves of technological disruption’, Law, innovation and technology 2022, 14(1), p. 5-40.
2.    A.D. Murray, ‘Internet regulation’, in: D. Levi-Faur (red.), Handbook on the Politics of Regulation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 2011, p. 272-274.
3.    J.R. Reidenberg, ‘Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules through Technology’, Texas Law Review 1997, 76-3, p. 553-593. 
4.    J.E. Cohen, ‘From lex informatica to the control revolution’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal 2021, 36, p. 1017.     
5.    L. Downes, The Laws of Disruption: Harnessing the New Forces That Govern Life and Business in the Digital Age, New York: Basic Books 2009.
6.    G.E. Marchant, The growing gap between emerging technologies and the law, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands 2011, p. 19-33.
7.    N.P. Suzor, Lawless: The secret rules that govern our digital lives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2019.
8.    M.J. de Zwart & S. Humphreys, ‘The lawless frontier of deep space: code as law in EVE Online’, Cultural Studies Review 2014, 20(1), p. 77-99.
9.    D.M. Nabirahni, B.R. Evans & A. Persaud, ‘Al-Khwarizmi (algorithm) and the development of algebra’, Mathematics Teaching Research Journal 2019, 11, p. 13-17.
10.    J. Burrell & M. Fourcade, ‘The Society of Algorithms’, Annual Review of Sociology 2021, 47/1, p. 213-223.
11.    J. Zittrain, ‘Perfect enforcement on tomorrow’s internet’, Regulating technologies: Legal futures, regulatory frames and technological fixes 2007, p. 125-156.
12.    D. Bell, The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. A Venture in Social Forecasting, New York: Basic Books 2008.
13.    M. Bovens, De Digitale Rechtsstaat: Beschouwingen over Rechtsstaat en Informatiemaatschappij, Alphen aan den Rijn: Samsom 1999.
14.    M. Hildebrandt, ‘Van informatiesamenleving naar datagestuurde samenleving’, in: S. van der Hof (red.), Recht en computer, Deventer: Kluwer 2014, p. 25-45. 
15.    M. Vetzo & J.H. Gerards, ‘Algoritme-gedreven technologieën en grondrechten’, Computerrecht 2019, 1, p. 10-19; Zie ook L. Kool e.a., Opwaarderen. Borgen van publieke waarden in de digitale samenleving, Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut 2017.
16.    M. Hildebrandt, ‘The New Imbroglio. Living with Machine Algorithms’, in: L. Janssens (red.), The Art of Ethics in the Information Society, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press 2016, p. 56.
17.    F. Mattern & C. Floerkemeier, ‘From the Internet of Computers to the Internet of Things, Informatik-Spektrum 2010, 33, 2, p. 107-121. 
18.    E.H.L. Aarts & J.L.  Encarnação, True Visions: The Emergence of Ambient Intelligence, Dordrecht: Springer 2006. 
19.    J. Evans, G. Schliwa & K. Luke, ‘The glorious failure of the experimental city: Cautionary tales from Arcosanti and Masdar City’, In: The Experimental City, New York: Routledge 2016, p. 218-235.
20.    K. Paskaleva & I. Cooper, ‘Are living labs effective? Exploring the evidence’, Technovation 2021, 106, 102311.
21.    B. Dorsemaine e.a., Internet of things: a definition & taxonomy, in: 2015 9th International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies IEEE 2015, p. 72-77.
22.    M. Aqeel e.a., ‘A Review of Security and Privacy Concerns in the Internet of Things (IoT)’, Journal of Sensors, 2022.
23.    J. Wang, M.K. Lim, C. Wang & M.L. Tseng, ‘The evolution of the Internet of Things (IoT) over the past 20 years’, Computers & Industrial Engineering 2021, 155, 107174.
24.    A.G. Eustis, ‘The Mirai Botnet and the importance of IoT device security’, In: S. Latifi (red.), 16th International Conference on Information Technology-New Generations, Springer International Publishing 2019, p. 85-89.
25.    K.R. Ludvigsen & S. Nagaraja, ‘The Opportunity to Regulate Cybersecurity in the EU (and the World): Recommendations for the Cybersecurity Resilience Act’, arXiv:2205.13196 2022. 
26.    E. Al Nuaimi, H. Al Neyadi, N. Mohamed & J. Al-Jaroodi, ‘Applications of big data to smart cities’, Journal of Internet Services and Applications 2015, 6(1), p. 1-15.
27.    R. Clarke, ‘Profiling: A hidden challenge to the regulation of data surveillance’, Journal of Law & Information and Science 1993, 4, 403.
28.    A.P. Engelfriet, ‘Big data: hype of trend?’, Tijdschrift voor Internetrecht 2014, nr. 3.
29.    F. Bosco e.a., ‘Profiling technologies and fundamental rights and values: regulatory challenges and perspectives from European Data Protection Authorities’, Reforming European Data Protection Law 2015, p. 3-33.
30.    V. Mosco, To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World, New York: Routledge 2015. 
31.    M.H. Maras & A.S. Wandt, ‘Enabling mass surveillance: data aggregation in the age of big data and the Internet of Things’, Journal of Cyber Policy 2019, 4(2), p. 160-177.
32.    H.R. Varian, ‘Beyond Big Data’, Business Economics 2014, 49(1), p. 27–31.
33.    S. Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, Profile Book 2019. 
34.    S. Zuboff, ‘Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and The Prospects of an Information Civilization’, Journal of information technology 2015, 30(1), p. 75-89.
35.    F. Liang, V. Das, N. Kostyuk & M.M. Hussain, ‘Constructing a data‐driven society: China's social credit system as a state surveillance infrastructure’, Policy & Internet 2018, 10(4), p. 415-453.
36.    P.F. Langer, ‘Lessons from China-The formation of a social credit system: Profiling, reputation scoring, social engineering’, The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research 2020, p. 164-174.
37.    C.M. Mulligan, ‘Perfect enforcement of law: when to limit and when to use technology’, Richmond Journal of Law & Technology 2008, 14(4), 13.
38.    B. Custers, ‘Het recht om de wet te overtreden?’, Nederlands Juristen Blad 2022, p. 1192.
39.    C.B. Fernandez & P. Hui, ‘Life, the Metaverse and everything: An overview of privacy, ethics, and governance in Metaverse’, 42nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW) IEEE 2022, p. 272-277.
40.    M. de Cock Buning, ‘Second Life’, IER 2007, 56; Zie ook T. Boellstorff, Coming of Age in Second Life, Princeton: Princeton University Press 2015.
41.    I.S. Wuisman, ‘De cyberjurisdictie van Facebook/Meta Platforms, Inc.’, Ondernemingsrecht 2022, 10.
42.    C. Smit, De volksverheffers. Sociaal hervormers in Nederland en de wereld 1870-1914, Hilversum: Verloren 2015; M. Borges en S. Torres, Company towns. Labor, Space, and Power Relations across Time and Continents, New York: Springer 2012.
43.    K. Nabben, ‘Resilience as 'Political Decentralization': An Alternate History of the Cypherpunks Origins of Decentralised Technology’, SSRN 2021. 
44.    S. Levy, Crypto: How the Code Rebels Beat the Government – Saving Privacy in the Digital Age, Londen: Penguin Books 2001. 
45.    S. Nakamoto, Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, 2008.
46.    M. Jansen, ‘Bitcoin: The Political ‘Virtual’ of an Intangible Material Currency’, International Journal of Community Currency Research 2013, 17, p. 8-18.
47.    ‘Hoe DigiCash alles verknalde’, NEXT! 27 april 1999.
48.    '2013: Year of the bitcoin’, Forbes magazine 10 december 2013.
49.    Rechtbank Overijssel 14 mei 2014, ECLI:NL:RBOVE:2014:2667.
50.    Hoge Raad 31 januari 2012, ECLI:NL:HR:2012:BQ9251; Zie ook Hoge Raad 31 januari 2012, ECLI:NL:HR:2012:BQ6575; Vgl. Hoge Raad 3 december 1996, ECLI:NL:HR:1996:ZD0584 over gegevens in het algemeen.
51.    A.W. Balthazor, ‘The Challenges of Cryptocurrency Asset Recovery’, Florida International University Law Review 2019, 13, 1207.
52.    D. Fullmer & A.S. Morse, ‘Analysis of difficulty control in bitcoin and proof-of-work blockchains’, IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC) 2018, p. 5988-5992.
53.    J.J. Linneman, ‘Juridische aspecten van (toepassingen van) blockchain’, Computerrecht 2016, 218.
54.    R. Rudman & R. Bruwer, ‘Defining Web 3.0: Opportunities and Challenges’, The Electronic Library 2016.
55.    M.R. Krul & T.R.A. Wondolleck, ‘Blockchain en de slimme overeenkomst in een juridisch perspectief’, Bedrijfsjuridische berichten 2018/66.
56.    N. Szabo, ‘Smart contracts: building blocks for digital markets’, EXTROPY: The Journal of Transhumanist Thought 1996, 16, 18(2), 28.
57.    D. Frisby, ‘Who is Satoshi Nakamoto?’ In: Bitcoin: The Future of Money?, Londen: Unbound 2014, p. 85-149.
58.    M.S. Miller, C. Morningstar & B. Frantz, ‘Capability-based financial instruments’, in: International Conference on Financial Cryptography, Berlin: Heidelberg 2000, p. 349-378.
59.    A.H. Mohammed, A.A. Abdulateef & I.A. Abdulateef, ‘Hyperledger, Ethereum and blockchain technology: a short overview’, in: 3rd International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA) 2021, p. 1-6. 
60.    C.L. Read, ‘The Rise of Ethereum and Hobby Mining’, in: The Bitcoin Dilemma: Weighing the Economic and Environmental Costs and Benefits, Cham: Springer International Publishing 2022, p. 137-145. 
61.    S. Hassan & P. de Filippi, ‘Decentralized autonomous organization’, Internet Policy Review 2021, 10(2), p. 1-10.
62.    R. Morrison, N.C. Mazey & S.C. Wingreen, ‘The DAO controversy: the case for a new species of corporate governance?’, Frontiers in Blockchain 2020, 3, 25.
63.    K. Werbach, ‘Trust, but verify: Why the blockchain needs the law’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal 2018, 33(2), p. 487-550.
64.    O. Rikken, M. Janssen & Z. Kwee, ‘Governance challenges of blockchain and decentralized autonomous organizations’, Information Polity 2019, 24(4), p. 397-417.
65.    A. Savelyev, ‘Contract Law 2.0: «Smart» Contracts as the Beginning of the End of Classic Contract Law’, National Research University Higher School of Economics Working Paper 2016.
66.    K.C. Laudon, ‘Ethical concepts and information technology’, Communications of the ACM 1995, 38, 12, p. 33-39.
67.    M. Haenlein & A.Kaplan, ‘A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence’, California management review 2019, 61.4, p. 5-14.
68.    E.M. Bender & A. Koller, ‘Climbing towards NLU: On Meaning, Form, and Understanding in the Age of Data’, Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2020, p. 5185–5198.
69.    R.S. Boyer e.a., ‘In memoriam: Edsger W. Dijkstra 1930—2002’, Communications of the ACM 2002, 45, 10, p. 21-22.
70.    R.M. French, ‘The Turing Test. The first 50 years’, Trends in cognitive sciences 2000, 4.3, p. 115-122.
71.    J.R. Searle, ‘The Chinese room revisited’, Behavioral and brain sciences 1982, 5.2, p. 345-348.
72.    S. Liao, ‘Expert system methodologies and applications—a decade review from 1995 to 2004’, Expert systems with applications 2005, 28.1, p. 93-103.
73.    D. Crevier, AI: The Tumultuous Search for Artificial Intelligence, New York: BasicBooks 1993. 
74.    A.L. Fradkov, ‘Early history of machine learning’, IFAC-PapersOnLine 2020, 53.2, p. 1385-1390.
75.    P. Langley, ‘The changing science of machine learning’, Machine Learning 2011, 82(3), p. 275–279. 
76.    O. Kaynak, ‘The golden age of Artificial Intelligence’, Discover Artificial Intelligence 2021, 1.
77.    A. Delipetrev, C. Tsinaraki & U. Kostić, Historical Evolution of Artificial Intelligence, Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union 2020.
78.    H.P. Newquist, The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, and Greed In The Search For Machines That Think, Camrel: Sams Publishing 1994.
79.    L. Deng & D. Yu, ‘Deep Learning: Methods and Applications’, Foundations and Trends in Signal Processing 2014, 7, 3-4, p. 1–199.
80.    D. Acemoglu & P.Restrepo, ‘Artificial intelligence, automation, and work’, in: The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda, Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2018, p. 197-236.
81.    J. Duursma, De digitale butler – Kansen en bedreigingen van kunstmatige intelligentie, Zaltbommel: Uitgeverij Haystack 2017.
82.    A. Kaplan & M. Haenlein, ‘Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence’, Business Horizons 2019, 62, 1, p. 15-25
83.    I. Ulnicane, ‘Artificial Intelligence in the European Union. Policy, ethics and regulation’, in: T. Hoerber, G. Weber & I. Cabras (red.), The Routledge handbook of European integrations, Londen: Routledge 2022. 
84.    M. Medvedeva, M. Vols & M. Wieling, ‘Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights’, Artificial Intelligence and Law 2020, 28.2, p. 237-266.
85.    E. Ntoutsi e.a., ‘Bias in data‐driven artificial intelligence systems - An introductory survey’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 2020, 10.3.
86.    C. O’Neil, Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy, New York: Crown Publishers 2017.
87.    S. Monteith & T. Glenn, ‘Automated Decision-Making and Big Data: Concerns for People With Mental Illness’, Current Psychiatry Reports 2016, 18, 112. 
88.    T. Araujo, N. Helberger, S. Kruikemeier & C.H. De Vreese, ‘In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence’, AI & society 2020, 35, p. 611-623.
89.    N.A. Smuha, ‘The EU approach to ethics guidelines for trustworthy artificial intelligence’, Computer Law Review International 2019, 20.4, p. 97-106.
90.    A. Meuwese & J. Wolswinkel, ‘Een Wet op de Artificiële Intelligentie? De Europese wetgever haalt de nationale in’, NJB 2022/92, p. 92-100.
91.    M. Veale & F.Z. Borgesius, ‘Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act—Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach’, Computer Law Review International 2021, 22.4, p. 97-112.
92.    R. Gellert, ‘The role of the risk-based approach in the General data protection Regulation and in the European Commission’s proposed Artificial Intelligence Act: Business as usual?’, Journal of Ethics and Legal Technologies 2021, 3(2).
93.    P. Hacker, ‘The European AI Liability Directives--Critique of a Half-Hearted Approach and Lessons for the Future’, arXiv:2211.13960. 
94.    L. Edwards & M. Veale, ‘Enslaving the algorithm: From a “right to an explanation” to a “right to better decisions”?’, IEEE Security & Privacy 2018, 16(3), p. 46-54.
95.    R. Brownsword & H. Somsen, ‘Law, innovation and technology: fast forward to 2021’, Law, Innovation and Technology 2021, 13(1), p. 1-28.
96.    N. Gunningham, P.N. Grabosky & D. Sinclair, Smart Regulation. Designing environmental policy, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1998.
97.    R. Brownsword, ‘Lost in Translation: Legality, Regulatory Margins, and Technological Management’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal 2011, 26, p. 1321-1365; R. Brownsword, E. Scotford & K. Yeung, ‘Law, Liberty and Technology’, in: The Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation and Technology, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017.
98.    R. Passchier, Artificiële intelligentie en de rechtsstaat, Den Haag: Boom Juridisch 2021. 

Referenties andere hoofdstukken

Hoofdstuk 5 

Hoofdstuk 6 

Hoofdstuk 7 

Hoofdstuk 8 (u bevindt zich op deze pagina)